DevOps & CI/CD
Deployments that are boring on purpose.
Read the scopeProject or retained
We design and build Azure environments as infrastructure as code. Networking, identity, governance and cost controls all live in Terraform, so the environment is reproducible rather than remembered.
Service
Azure Infrastructure & Architecture
Engagement
Project or retained
Greenfield build
6 – 12 weeks
In short
Azure infrastructure architecture is the design and construction of an Azure estate as code: networking, identity, governance and cost controls expressed in Terraform, so the environment can be rebuilt from source rather than remembered.
The problem
Most Azure estates start in the portal. Someone needed a virtual machine, then a database, then a network rule to make them talk. It works, until you need a second environment, or an auditor asks how a resource is configured, or the person who built it leaves. An estate that exists only in the portal is an estate that cannot be reproduced, reviewed or reasoned about.
Scope
Anything outside this list is quoted separately rather than absorbed quietly.
Deliverables
Every item here is an artifact you own, in your systems, readable by someone who was not in the room.
Every significant choice, the alternatives considered and why this one. So the next engineer inherits reasoning, not just resources.
Modular, reviewed, and runnable by your team. We do not hold the state file hostage.
Current and target, drawn accurately enough to hand to an auditor.
A working session plus written runbooks covering how to change, extend and recover the environment.
Greenfield build: 6 – 12 weeks
A landing zone and first workload. Migrations and brownfield remediation are scoped separately after assessment.
Fit
We would rather lose the engagement at this paragraph than three weeks in.
A good fit if
Not a fit if
Questions
Terraform by default, because it covers Entra ID, Azure DevOps and third-party providers in one state, and because the hiring pool is larger. If your team already runs Bicep well, we will use Bicep rather than force a migration for its own sake.
That is the preferred arrangement. The handover is the point of the engagement, and it goes better when your team has been in the pull requests from week one rather than receiving a finished estate.
We assess first and tell you honestly what is worth importing into code, what is worth rebuilding, and what should be left alone until it is retired. Importing everything is rarely the right answer.
Often paired with
These are the combinations that come up most often, not an upsell list.
Deployments that are boring on purpose.
Read the scopeSoftware your team can still maintain in a year.
Read the scopeSecurity judgment, on retainer.
Read the scopeAzure Infrastructure & Architecture
Tell us what the environment looks like today. We will tell you what we would change first, and whether this is the right engagement for it.